This entry was posted
on Thursday, October 25th, 2012 at 5:42 am and is filed under Carlos Condit.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
26 Responses to “Carlos Condit thoughts on Nick Diaz, GSP and marijuana”
hahaha what a fuckign joke , carlos conduit why did you do it ? you had 20+ fights with guys more dangerous than diaz and you fought normal but with he diaz fight you did some shit that ive never seen in a professional mma match. and you said you put on a good show ? what you smoke dude ?
Condit landed one good body kick. He landed one good combo (the leg, body & head kick). Diaz landed the better punches to the face (which is all that matters in a fight). When Condit was running backwards, Diaz landed quite a few shots that snapped Condit’s head back. Rewatch the fight, dumbass. Diaz landed the more significant damaging shots (to the face). That’s a fact of reality.
your dumb lol your right boring fight but the only good shots landed in the entire fight where combos by condit with head kicks only 1 of is comboes landed but its the only thing that landed in the entire fight on both sides lol
You Diaz nut huggers…. Yeah he kept some distance. He also kneed, kicked, elbowed, and punched Diaz in combinations repeatedly. Stand and bang with the guy and then see if you can still rant about what a coward he is.
Diaz was the only one trying to engage. Condit was the one running away. When I fight people (which I don’t) and say they were bigger and better than me at fighting, I would punch and run. That is exactly what condit did. And that is not why I scored the fight 3 rounds to 2 for Diaz, diaz did more on the ground, he was the aggressor, and he landed combo after combo. Diaz is a fighter, strait up. Condit had respect be4 this fight, but lost it due to his lack of passion for fighting in this fight.
If you get a cheap cop-out, then I feel I get one, too. Ready: Joe Rogan said Nick won the fight, therefore it is true. Joe Rogan is a “MMM-Scientist” If anything, and KNOWS shit loads more about MMA than all three of those judges put-together. So, b/c joe said it, nick won the fight. Do you get that logic? If condit KO’d Diaz, then would we debate? If Condit DOMINATED diaz for 5 rounds, there would be NO debate. Watch Nate Diaz vs Rory M. – Went to Dec. but it was obvious Rory won, no debate.
That’s a cheap cop-out. The judges say he won the fight, therefore he won? MMA, and the fights that go to decision, you know, the ones that are close, have always been subjective, and have been debatable on who really thinks won the fight. It was a close fight, and could have gone either way. Pac needs to just accept that bradley won, too, huh? What about vera vs couture? We are talking fighting here, right? Nick is a fighter, and comes to fight. Condit Did not IMO.
Close fight. I gave Diaz rounds 1,2, and 5. It was close, for sure. I would have deducted the fuck out of Condit for back-pedalling the whole fight. When you fight, you engage. Well, that’s my opinion, at least. Diaz is what seems to be a real fighter to me. It’s just my opinion, though, and everyone has one!